Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to determine the influence of organizational support, quality of work life and job satisfaction on work productivity. The population in this study was 30 people so that the entire population was used as a sample. Based on the data analysis process, the first step is to test classical assumptions and then hypothesis testing is carried out. The statistical method used is multiple regression analysis. Based on the results of the t hypothesis test, the significance value for the organizational support variable was 0.014 <0.05. The value of tcount > ttable (2.629 > 2.055). So it can be partially concluded that organizational support has a significant effect on work productivity. The significance value of the quality of work life variable is 0.023 <0.05. The value of tcount > ttable (2.419 > 2.055). It can be partially concluded that the Quality of Work Life has a significant effect on Work Productivity. The significance value of the job satisfaction variable is 0.024 <0.05. The value of tcount > ttable (2.399 > 2.055). So it can be partially concluded that job satisfaction has a significant effect on work productivity. Based on the results of the F hypothesis test, the Fcount > Ftable value was obtained, namely 17.227 > 2.98 and the F significance value was 0.000 < 0.05. So it can be concluded that H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. Thus, together (simultaneously), Organizational Support, Quality of Work Life, and Job Satisfaction have a positive and significant effect on Work Productivity.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Christian, L.Y. (2015). The Influence of Perceived Organizational Support and Situational Lead-ership on Job Satisfaction at Uranus Bookstore. Agora Vol. 3, no. 1, (2015), 448.
Hasibuan, M. 2012. Human Resource Management, Print 1. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Hasibuan, M. 2017. Human Resource Management. Jakarta: PT. Literary Earth.
Nawawi, Ismail. 2016. Leadership and Performance Organizational Culture. Jakarta: PT. Fajar Iterpratama Mandiri.
Kambu, A. (2012). Influence of Leader-Member Exchange, Perceived Organizational Support, Papua Ethnic Culture and Organizational Citizenship Behavior toward Employee Perfor-mance of Workers in Papua Provincial Secretary Office. IOSR Journal of Business and Man-agement, 31-38.
Nawawi, Ismail. 2016. Leadership and Performance Organizational Culture. Jakarta: PT. Fajar Iterpratama Mandiri.
Porkiani. M. et. Al. 2011. Relationship Between the Quality of Work Life and Employees' Aggres-sion. In Journal of American Science (online); 7(2) 687-706; Available: http//www.americanscience.org.
Rhoades, L., and Eisenberger, R. (2016). "Perceived organizational support: A review of the lit-erature". Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 698–714
Siagian, Sondang P. 2015. Human Resource Management. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Simanjuntak, Payaman J. 2011. Performance Evaluation Management. Edition 3. Jakarta: Faculty of UI